Anit-Ragging & Grievance Redressal

Ragging is a criminal offence as per the Supreme Court Verdict.                                        
Ragging is an offence under penal code and under section 116 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 (Karnataka Act No.1 of 1995), which define ragging as:                   

Causing, inducing, compelling or forcing a student, whether by way of practical joke or otherwise, to do any act which detracts from human dignity or violates his/her person or exposes him/her to ridicule from doing any lawful act. By intimidating, wrongfully restraining, wrongfully confining, or injuring him or by using criminal force on him/her or by holding out to him/her any threat of intimidation, wrongful confinement, injury or the use of criminal force.                                    

As per the AICTE norms, each and every student is required to submit 2 Affidavits, 

Student Affidavit: Affidavit Undertaking as per the provisions of anti-ragging verdict by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on a stamp paper.      

Parent Affidavit: Affidavit Undertaking as per the provisions of anti-ragging verdict by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on a stamp paper. 

A format of the both the Affidavit are attached with the admission form. Students are required to download the affidavit, and read UGC REGULATIONS ON CURBING THE MENACE OF RAGGING IN HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, 2009. (under Section 26 (1)(g) of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956), and submit the Affidavits on stamp 

Ragging in all its forms is totally banned in this institution including in its departments, constituent units, all its premises (academic, residential, sports, kiosks, cafeteria and the like) whether located within the campus or outside and in all means of transportation of students whether public or private. The institution shall take strict action including but not limited to criminal proceeding and/or cancellation of admission against those found guilty of ragging and/or of abetting ragging and the burden of proof shall hereby lie on the perpetrator of alleged ragging and not on the victim. An offence of Ragging may be charged either on a written complaint by the affected or on independent finding of the Anti Ragging Squad. The Institution is bound by the UGC Regulations on Curbing the Menace of Ragging in Higher Educational Institutions 2009.                                                                


Anti-Ragging Helpline at Rustomjee Business School - Mr. Atul Shelar -022-28937458

In the case of any ragging incident, the students may immediately call and bring it to the above persons notice for necessary help, guidance and actions.                              

The freshers / junior students are hereby instructed that they should move in groups within the academic areas / campus, should not respond to the calls from seniors, should not participate in any kind of "freshers’ party" anywhere inside/outside the campus, desist from doing anything against their will even if ordered by the seniors and that, they have nothing to fear as the institution cares for them and shall not tolerate any atrocities against them.                                                              

Director                                                                                                                                       

 All other offences following from the definition of "Ragging.            

Punishments against Ragging:   

Depending upon the nature and gravity of the offence as established by the Anti-Ragging Committee of the Institution, the possible punishments for those found guilty of ragging shall be any one or any combination of the following

  • Suspension from attending classes and academic privileges
  • Withholding / withdrawing scholarship / fellowship and other benefits
  • Forfeiting Campus Placement opportunities / recommendations
  • Debarring from appearing in any test/examination or other evaluation process
  • Withholding of results
  • Debarring from representing the institution in any regional, national or international meet, tournament, youth festival etc.
  • Suspension/ expulsion from the hostel
  • Cancellation of Admission
  • Rustication from the institution for a period, ranging from 1 to 3 years
  • Expulsion from the institution and consequent debarring from admission to any other institution for a specific period
  • Fine of Rupees 25,000/- 
  • Collective punishment: When the persons committing or abetting the crime of ragging are not identified, the institution shall resort to collective punishment as a deterrent to ensure community pressure on the potential raggers.

In addition, in case of every single incident of ragging, a First Information Report (FIR) will be filed with the local police authorities. The possible punishment includes rigorous imprisonment (in compliance with the order of Supreme Court of India)

Any violations of code of conduct will be seriously viewed and will be punishable      

Punishable Ingredients of Ragging:

  • Abetment / instigation to ragging
  • Criminal conspiracy to rag
  • Unlawful assembly and rioting while ragging
  • Public nuisance created during ragging
 Violation of decency and morals through ragging
  • Injury to body, causing hurt / mental trauma or grievous hurt
  • Wrongful restraint
  • Wrongful confinement
  • Use of criminal force
  • Assault as well as sexual offences or unnatural offences
  • Extortion
  • Criminal trespass
  • Offences against property
  • Criminal intimidation
  • Attempt to commit any or all of the above mentioned offences against the victim
  • Physical or psychological humiliation
  • Any act / abuse by spoken words, e-mails, snail mails, blogs, public insults etc.
  • Any act that prevents, disrupts or disturbs the regular academic activity of a student       

GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL POLICY 

In order to meet the increasing legitimate expectations of customers for better, faster and more effective service, the Company shall constantly endeavour to improve its service delivery standards and capabilities. The Company expects all its Officers and employees to maintain highest standards of integrity and transparency in their transactions with customers, intermediaries and other stakeholders.

A Grievance is a documented manifestation of dissatisfaction of a customer. Such dissatisfaction, if left unaddressed and unresolved, could endanger the lifeline of the Company and erode its image. It is therefore expected that all employees shall devote attention, time and effort at resolving the Grievances of the customers within the framework of the Company’s guidelines and the terms of the policy.           

OBJECTIVES:                                                                                                                               

The objectives of the Grievance Redressal Policy are:                                                                       

  • To develop an organisational framework to resolve Grievances of Customers and other stakeholders  
  • To provide the Customers access to immediate, hassle free recourse to have their Grievances redressed 
  • To enlighten the Customers on their duties and responsibilities to access benefits due under the policies 
  • To establish structured interactions with Customers to elicit information on their expectations 
  • To identify systemic flaws in the design and administration of various general insurance products and to seek solutions thereon, and 
  • To institute a monitoring mechanism to oversee the functioning of the Grievance Redressal Policy   

RESPONSIBILITY FOR REDRESSAL: 

The final responsibility for Grievance Redressal rests with the Chairman Cum Managing Director of the Company. The Officer In Charge of a Regional Office, Divisional Office and Branch Office are responsible for resolution of Grievances relating to their respective territory.

The Company expects that Grievance Redressal be time bound and result oriented. Every Grievance is expected to be resolved within a maximum period of fifteen working days.The Board of Directors of the company shall monitor status and progress of Grievance Redressal and the Regional Grievance Cells shall furnish quarterly report on Grievance Redressal position for submission to the Board.

DOCUMENTING GRIEVANCES:                                                                                          

The Grievance Redressal Machinery starts with a proper documtation protocol.

A Grievance is defined as any communication that expresses dissatisfaction about an action or lack of action or about the standard of service / deficiency of service of the Company and/or an intermediary representing the Company.

Thus any communication, as defined above - written, verbal or digital- shall be recorded in the Grievance system.

Immediately on receipt of a Grievance, the concerned Office shall send a written communication to the complainant (the person who lodges the Grievance with the COMPANY/ ), stating the following:

  • Acknowledging his communication                                                                                            
  • Promising necessary action within fifteen working days from the date of receipt of the Grievance
  • The name, address, email id and Phone number of the authority to whom the Grievance has been forwarded (in case the Grievance relates to another office)

The name, address, email id and Phone number of the authority to whom the Complainant could escalate the matter if his Grievance is not redressed within the specified timeframe or if he is not satisfied with the action taken.

STRUCTURE OF GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL MECHANISM:                                                           

The Grievance Redressal machinery would be three tiered with the Corporate Grievance Cell functioning at the apex level, the Regional Grievance Cell at the Regional Office, and the Divisional Grievance Cell at the Divisional Office. While the principal function of the Divisional Grievance Cell would be to redress the Grievances, it is expected the Grievance Cells at the Regional and Corporate level play a more proactive role in not only redressing Grievances, but in minimising their incidence. These two cells shall address Grievance not only in terms of their content, but also in terms of their context, to discern circumstances that give rise to repeated Grievances. The cells at the Corporate and Regional level shall carry out a root cause analysis on the Grievances to provide inputs to the corporate management on product redesign, policy redesign, emulation of best practices, etc.

REDRESSAL COMMITTEES:                                                                                                          

To provide a meaningful review mechanism and a forum for appeal to the complainants on the decisions taken at operating levels, this policy envisages the constitution of Redressal Committees at various levels as under:

DIVISIONAL REDRESSAL COMMITTEE:                                                                                        

The members of the Divisional Redressal Committee(DRC) shall be the same as the members of the Divisional Claims Committee. The DRC shall take up any Grievance where the subject matter of dispute is repudiation of a claim or short payment of a claim or refund of premium. All claims and refunds falling within the financial powers of a Scale II officer and Health claims upto Rs.100000 shall be taken up for review by the Committee.

The decision of the Committee shall be by consensus. If there is no unanimity on the decision, the Committee members shall record their assenting and dissenting views on the Grievance and escalate the Grievance to Regional Redressal COMMITTEE.

If the decision is unanimous, the complainant should be informed of the decision and also of the fact that in case the complainant is not satisfied with the decision of the DRC, he can apply for reconsideration of this Grievance to Regional Grievance Cell or to the Office of the Insurance Ombudsman concerned if his case is covered under the Redressal of Public Grievances Rules, 1998. The address of the Regional Grievance Cell and that of the Insurance Ombudsman shall also be furnished in such communication.

REGIONAL REDRESSAL COMMITTEE:

The Regional Redressal Committee (RRC) shall comprise of:

  • The Region In Charge
  • A retired High Court Judge/ Retired District Judge
  • An Officer in the rank of Scale V, or if no such Officer is available, an Officer in the rank of Scale
  • The General Manager In Charge of Grievance at the Corporate office shall be the competent authority to constitute the RRC.
The RRC shall take into consideration the following cases:
  • Claims or Refunds exceeding the limits of Scale II Officers and up to the limits of Scale IV Officers, including those which fall within the powers of the Divisional Claims Committee
  • Health claims exceeding Rs 100000 and not exceeding Rs. 500000
  •  Where the complainant, not being satisfied with the DRC decision, approaches the Regional Grievance Cell for reconsideration
  •  Where there is no consensus among the members of the DRC on any Grievance

The RRC shall be convened at least once a month, unless there are no Grievances coming under consideration.

The RRC shall consider the different views of the Divisional office, Surveyor, TPA and Complainant and shall pass an order on the case.

The decision of the Committee shall be by consensus. If there is no unanimity on the decision, the Committee members shall record their assenting and dissenting views on the Grievance and escalate the Grievance to Corporate Redressal COMMITTEE.

If the decision is unanimous, the complainant should be informed of the decision and also of the fact that in case the complainant is not satisfied with the decision of the RRC, he can apply for reconsideration of this Grievance to Corporate Grievance Cell, or to the Office of the Insurance Ombudsman concerned if his case is covered under the Redressal of Public Grievances Rules, 1998. The address of the Corporate Grievance Cell and that of the Insurance Ombudsman shall also be furnished in such communication.

CORPORATE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE:                                                                                       

The Corporate Redressal Committee (CRC) shall comprise of:

a)    The General Manager In Charge of Grievance Department at the Corporate Office

b)    A Retired Judge of High Court                                                                                                   

c)    The Deputy General Manager of the concerned Technical Department at the Corporate Office

The CRC shall be constituted by the Chairman cum Managing Director of the Company.

The CRC shall take into consideration the following cases

  • Claims or Refunds exceeding the limits of Scale IV Officers and up to the limits of Scale VI Officers, including those which fall within the powers of the Regional Claims Committee
  • Health claims exceeding Rs. 500000 Where the complainant, not being satisfied with the RRC decision, approaches the Corporate Grievance Cell for reconsideration
  • Where there is no consensus among the members of the RRC on any Grievance                                                                                                                                                    

The decision of the CRC shall be by consensus. The CRC shall consider the views of the Regional Office, the Surveyor or the TPA, and those of the complainant and take a decision on the merits of the case. The CRC shall then pass an order on the case.                             

The complainant shall be informed of the decision of the CRC and also of the fact that in case the complainant is not satisfied with the decision of the CRC, he can apply to the Office of the Insurance Ombudsman concerned, if his case is covered under the Redressal of Public Grievances Rules, 1998.

POWERS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE COMMITTEES:

Any Grievance could be taken up for redressal by the DRC or RRC only if the issue relates to policy or personnel falling under its jurisdiction. An Order passed by the DRC, RRC or CRC shall be complied with by the Office concerned. The Committee concerned shall not consider any Grievance which is barred by Limitation either under the terms of the policy or under law. An amount of Rs.4000 and Rs. 5000 per sitting can be paid to the nonofficial member of the RRC and CRC respectively.

CUSTOMER FOCUS:  

Grievance Redressal Mechanism should not only seek to redress Grievances but also to avoid them.

The company shall endeavour to improve service through constant interactions with the customers to elicit their views on service delivery standards, and to seek their suggestions for improvement. At least one meeting per year shall be held by every Regional Office where retail customers are invited to offer opinions and suggestions on Customer service. Their feedback should be accorded due consideration by implementing their suggestions, wherever feasible.

The company shall take all efforts to abide by and enforce its Citizens’ Charter in all its operations. The company shall respect and enforce Policyholders’ Rights as enshrined in the Regulator’s document. The company shall also abide by the Code of Commitment approved by the General Insurance Council. It is also expected that the company should evolve its code of commitment on specific timelines for deliverables.

All efforts shall be made to leverage Information Technology for providing an easy platform to the customers to lodge grievances, to track the status of grievances, to enlighten them on claims procedures, to provide access to information on whom to contact and to enhance service standards.

The company recognises its duties to customers who may not be inclined to approach through technology enabled channels, and to suit the needs of such customers, it is expected that the company shall establish helpline services to enable them faster access for lodging a Grievance.

Senior citizens of the country require special attention and consideration and the company shall establish a Senior Citizen Cell at the corporate office to focus on issues related to them.

To encourage the spirit of Customer focus and orientation to Grievance Redresal, reward and commendation would be given to the Region which has the best Grievance Disposal rate, in relation to the volume of business handled.                                                                           

TRANSPARENCY:                                                                                                                         

Employees are expected to maintain transparency in their communication with the customers. Repudiation letters shall not be cursory, but shall elaborate the reasons on why a claim could not be entertained. Should the customer request to know why any settlement falls short of his claim, the company has an obligation to explain the difference, including providing a copy of the Survey Report, which incidentally, is a right under the Policyholders’ Rights.    

DPG, IRDA GRIEVANCES:  

All coordination with DPG, IRDA, Ministry and other regulatory bodies would be done only by the Corporate Grievance Cell. All offices are expected to clear these Grievances expedetiously.                                                                                                          

POWERS OF INTERPRETATION, MODIFICATION:                                                                        

The Chairman cum Managing Director of the company is vested with the powers to lay down guidelines for the implementation of this policy and to modify procedures stated in this policy, within its overall framework. 



SelectionFile type iconFile nameDescriptionSizeRevisionTimeUser
Ċ
View Download
  51k v. 2 Apr 25, 2013, 9:54 PM punit valecha
Ċ
View Download
  93k v. 2 Apr 25, 2013, 9:54 PM punit valecha
Comments